Forums/Armchair-GM

What is Gustafssons worth

Créé par: Xmarshldillon
Date de création initiale: nov 18, 2019
Publié: Nov 18 at 4:20 pm
Équipe: 2019-20 Blackhawks de Chicago
Explications
I feel like it's a prospect and a second but I would like to hear other opinions.
ANNÉE DE REPÊCHAGERONDE 1RONDE 2RONDE 3RONDE 4RONDE 5RONDE 6RONDE 7
2020
CHI
CHI
CHI
CHI
CHI
2021
CHI
CHI
CHI
CHI
CHI
CHI
MTL
2022
CHI
CHI
CHI
CHI
CHI
CHI
CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS BONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $80 026 794 $0 $6 707 500 $1 473 206 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
CHI
Smith, Zack
3 250 000 $
AG, C
NTC
UFA - 2
CHI
Toews, Jonathan
10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
CHI
Kane, Patrick
10 500 000 $
AD, C
NMC
UFA - 4
CHI
Caggiula, Drake
1 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
CHI
Shaw, Andrew
3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
CHI
Saad, Brandon
6 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
CHI
Kubalik, Dominik
925 000 $
AG
RFA - 1
CHI
Kämpf, David
1 000 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 2
CHI
Carpenter, Ryan
1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
CHI
DeBrincat, Alex
778 333 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
CHI
Dach, Kirby
925 000 $
C
RFA - 3
CHI
Nylander, Alexander
863 333 $
AD, AG
RFA - 2
CHI
Strome, Dylan
863 333 $
C
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
CHI
Keith, Duncan
5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
CHI
Seabrook, Brent
6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
CHI
Crawford, Corey
6 000 000 $
G
NMC NTC
UFA - 1
CHI
De Haan, Calvin
4 550 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
CHI
Murphy, Connor
3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
CHI
Lehner, Robin
5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
CHI
Määttä, Olli
4 083 333 $
DG
UFA - 3
CHI
Gustafsson, Erik
1 200 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
CHI
Koekkoek, Slater
925 000 $
DG
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
18 nov à 16 h 35
#1
exo2769
Rejoint: jui 2015
Messages: 5,054
Mentions "j'aime": 1,249
I am a Hawks fan. I know that he's an offensive defenseman. He's also back to his level of play from last year. Admittedly, there was a dip earlier in the year, but it's been widely reported that it was a systematic change that affected the Hawks play as a team and not any individualistic effort or lack thereof. What that means is that his value isn't quite what it was last year. That dip happened, but if he continues to play the way he has the last few games he can be a difference maker for a playoff caliber team.

There are a couple of things that definitely go in his favor. Literally every team in the NHL can afford his cap hit. So teams like Vegas or TOR or BOS or AZ can easily take his cap. This matters because not every team can take on a Mike Green even at 50% retained. Theoretically this should help drive up his TDL price tag.

I'd tend to agree with you that a 2nd and prospect is about right. "prospect" is pretty vague though. A 2nd and an A prospect or 1st and B prospect. If his play decreases then we need to look at recent TDL history to see that many 7th dmen went for 3rd rounders...so a 2nd might be right and an AHL player.
Aussie_Blackhawk a aimé ceci.
18 nov à 17 h 35
#2
Rejoint: oct 2019
Messages: 144
Mentions "j'aime": 38
Quoting: exo2769
I am a Hawks fan. I know that he's an offensive defenseman. He's also back to his level of play from last year. Admittedly, there was a dip earlier in the year, but it's been widely reported that it was a systematic change that affected the Hawks play as a team and not any individualistic effort or lack thereof. What that means is that his value isn't quite what it was last year. That dip happened, but if he continues to play the way he has the last few games he can be a difference maker for a playoff caliber team.

There are a couple of things that definitely go in his favor. Literally every team in the NHL can afford his cap hit. So teams like Vegas or TOR or BOS or AZ can easily take his cap. This matters because not every team can take on a Mike Green even at 50% retained. Theoretically this should help drive up his TDL price tag.

I'd tend to agree with you that a 2nd and prospect is about right. "prospect" is pretty vague though. A 2nd and an A prospect or 1st and B prospect. If his play decreases then we need to look at recent TDL history to see that many 7th dmen went for 3rd rounders...so a 2nd might be right and an AHL player.


Spot on
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Supprimer une option
Soumettre le sondage