Forums/NHL Signings

Los Angeles Kings signed Jack Campbell (2 Years / $1,650,000 AAV)

Was this a good signing?
Le graphique a été masqué

Options de sondage

 

7 sep 2019 à 14 h 29
#1
Jack Campbell has signed a new contract with the Los Angeles Kings.
CONTRAT STANDARD (PROLONGATION)
COMPARER CE CONTRAT
DURÉE: 2 ANNÉES
STATUT À L’ÉCHÉANCE DU CONTRAT: UFA
CONTRAT SIGNÉ AVEC: Kings de Los AngelesKings de Los Angeles
VALEUR: 3 300 000 $
% DU C.H. : 2,02
DATE DE SIGNATURE: 7 septembre 2019
SOURCE: CapFriendly
SAISONCLAUSECAP HIT AAV BONIS DE PERF. BONIS DE SIGN. SALAIRE DE BASE SALAIRE TOTAL SALAIRE DES LIGUES MINEURES
2020-211 650 000 $1 650 000 $0 $0 $1 500 000 $1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
2021-221 650 000 $1 650 000 $0 $0 $1 800 000 $1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
TOTAL3 300 000 $3 300 000 $0 $0 $3 300 000 $3 300 000 $3 300 000 $
7 sep 2019 à 14 h 30
#2
AwesomeMatthews
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 714
Mentions "j'aime": 547
First smart move the Kings have made in a while
Rooney, SpaghettiPasta, moli92 and 7 others a aimé ceci.
7 sep 2019 à 14 h 40
#3
bhavikp27
Rejoint: jun 2016
Messages: 2,249
Mentions "j'aime": 554
If he stays as good, that's a steal. Wonder when they decide to move Quick/go with Campbell/Petersen since they have 3 years on their new deals
OldNYIfan et KubaH a aimé ceci.
7 sep 2019 à 14 h 48
#4
Tom Wilson of ACGM
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,543
Mentions "j'aime": 665
Are you kidding me Blake?!!!!!!! Wtf.
7 sep 2019 à 14 h 48
#5
Tom Wilson of ACGM
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,543
Mentions "j'aime": 665
Quoting: AwesomeMatthews
First smart move the Kings have made in a while


This is dumb dude.
7 sep 2019 à 15 h 22
#6
Cale 4 Calder
Rejoint: aoû 2017
Messages: 2,692
Mentions "j'aime": 1,122
Quoting: Bf3351
Are you kidding me Blake?!!!!!!! Wtf.


whats wrong with it? I dont watch many LAK games but based on his stats it seems like he has been very good the last 2 years. Its an inexpensive contract for a relatively short term. Whats not to like?
SpaghettiPasta, rollie1967 et KubaH a aimé ceci.
7 sep 2019 à 15 h 24
#7
Formerly klondikebar
Rejoint: mar 2019
Messages: 3,421
Mentions "j'aime": 1,691
He’s a great backup. I’m a fan
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
7 sep 2019 à 15 h 26
#8
Tom Wilson of ACGM
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,543
Mentions "j'aime": 665
Quoting: moli92
whats wrong with it? I dont watch many LAK games but based on his stats it seems like he has been very good the last 2 years. Its an inexpensive contract for a relatively short term. Whats not to like?


He's been very inconsistent. Last season was his only decent season. We have him for another year at around 600k then this contract. Which means we have him for another 3 years... This obviously means Quick is gone within a year or to because Petersens contract is a one way NHL contract after this season. I would have much rather signer Kuemper in FA than keep Campbell. This signing is basically saying that Petersen and Campbell are our future goaltenders.
7 sep 2019 à 15 h 26
#9
Tom Wilson of ACGM
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,543
Mentions "j'aime": 665
Quoting: AndrewLadd
He’s a great backup. I’m a fan


He's an inconsistent backup.
7 sep 2019 à 15 h 30
#10
Cale 4 Calder
Rejoint: aoû 2017
Messages: 2,692
Mentions "j'aime": 1,122
Quoting: Bf3351
He's been very inconsistent. Last season was his only decent season. We have him for another year at around 600k then this contract. Which means we have him for another 3 years... This obviously means Quick is gone within a year or to because Petersens contract is a one way NHL contract after this season. I would have much rather signer Kuemper in FA than keep Campbell. This signing is basically saying that Petersen and Campbell are our future goaltenders.


fair enough. But I dont think Kuemper is much of an upgrade over Campbell. Hes a bit younger and will likely have a lower cap hit than Kuemper. If LAK is going to rebuild/retool for the next few years, is trading Quick and having a Petersen/Campbell duo really that bad?
Bf3351 et SpaghettiPasta a aimé ceci.
7 sep 2019 à 15 h 38
#11
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 1,727
Mentions "j'aime": 140
Doesn’t make sense. Cal Peterson is poised to take the starting role and you can’t waive or trade Quick.
7 sep 2019 à 15 h 53
#12
Rejoint: nov 2018
Messages: 2,362
Mentions "j'aime": 500
Well Quick will be in an Oiler jersey soon maybe ?
OrangeMallard a aimé ceci.
7 sep 2019 à 15 h 59
#13
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 2,261
Mentions "j'aime": 888
I think this was intended to dangle two quality goaltenders to Seattle at the expansion draft. If the Kings traded Campbell and Seattle took Quick, they'd be without a quality backup to Petersen in 2021. If the Kings trade Quick, Campbell will likely get selected, and they'd again be without a duo of solid goaltenders. This way, the Kings can have 3 quality goaltenders going into the expansion draft, and still have two quality goaltenders coming out the other side.

Will be interesting to see what they do in 2020-21. They'll have 3 goaltenders on the roster. Not sure what they'll do. The Islanders carried three guys for a while, perhaps LA will too.
OrangeMallard et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
7 sep 2019 à 16 h 28
#14
AwesomeMatthews
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 714
Mentions "j'aime": 547
Quoting: Bf3351
This is dumb dude.


Signing Kovalchuk bad move, over paying for everyone on their roster for to much term bad move, drafting Kupari over Merkley and Miller bad move, bringing in Todd Mclellan horrible move just ask Sharks fans
Random2152, OrangeMallard et palhal a aimé ceci.
7 sep 2019 à 18 h 00
#15
Tom Wilson of ACGM
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,543
Mentions "j'aime": 665
Quoting: AwesomeMatthews
Signing Kovalchuk bad move, over paying for everyone on their roster for to much term bad move, drafting Kupari over Merkley and Miller bad move, bringing in Todd Mclellan horrible move just ask Sharks fans


Are you brain dead? Do you know anything about Merkley? Even his junior team don't want him because he is a problem. Attitude mostly. He's also very bad defensively. Kupari is going to be a good top 6 winger in the NHL in a year or two. Nothing wrong with that pick. Kovalchuk is fine. He's going to do way better this season. Last season was not his fault and considering the henders he had that were out of his control he did pretty damn good. I agree it was dumb of Blake and Luc to bring Kovi in thinking that was all we needed to fix our scoring problems. Blake is dumb we can agree that he hasn't done very good, but to say that this was smart we disagree. This is another dumb thing by Blake.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
7 sep 2019 à 19 h 29
#16
Cale 4 Calder
Rejoint: aoû 2017
Messages: 2,692
Mentions "j'aime": 1,122
Quoting: AH96
Doesn’t make sense. Cal Peterson is poised to take the starting role and you can’t waive or trade Quick.


Why can't they trade Quick?
7 sep 2019 à 20 h 52
#17
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 89
Mentions "j'aime": 17
Quicks contract isnt very attractive, especially when he cant stay healthy. His numbers last year were awful. At 33- they should let him go, hope that one of Peterson or Campbell can step up. Campbells contract is pretty good value for a backup with decent numbers. Playing in front of that defense cant be easy (and its only going to look worse without Muzzin for the whole year).
7 sep 2019 à 21 h 25
#18
Rejoint: déc 2017
Messages: 1,835
Mentions "j'aime": 774
He's the Kings #1 Goalie right now, right? Has to be, at least based on the numbers.
8 sep 2019 à 5 h 50
#19
Just a Sad Green Man
Rejoint: jui 2019
Messages: 109
Mentions "j'aime": 56
smile First the Kempe signing now this. These may be small steps but at least the Kings are moving in the right direction
OldNYIfan et drewjenks a aimé ceci.
8 sep 2019 à 13 h 26
#20
First NY Then LA
Rejoint: jun 2018
Messages: 8,092
Mentions "j'aime": 3,398
Quoting: Bf3351
Are you brain dead? Do you know anything about Merkley? Even his junior team don't want him because he is a problem. Attitude mostly. He's also very bad defensively. Kupari is going to be a good top 6 winger in the NHL in a year or two. Nothing wrong with that pick. Kovalchuk is fine. He's going to do way better this season. Last season was not his fault and considering the henders he had that were out of his control he did pretty damn good. I agree it was dumb of Blake and Luc to bring Kovi in thinking that was all we needed to fix our scoring problems. Blake is dumb we can agree that he hasn't done very good, but to say that this was smart we disagree. This is another dumb thing by Blake.


People forget that at the press conference announcing Kovalchuk's signing Blake stated that he hoped for 20 goals from Kovi. Kovalchuk's season extrapolates to exactly that; too bad the idiot Desjardins held him out of about a quarter of the games and limited his ice time in many others.
Bf3351 a aimé ceci.
8 sep 2019 à 15 h 28
#21
Rejoint: aoû 2017
Messages: 1,607
Mentions "j'aime": 495
Quoting: Bf3351
He's been very inconsistent. Last season was his only decent season. We have him for another year at around 600k then this contract. Which means we have him for another 3 years... This obviously means Quick is gone within a year or to because Petersens contract is a one way NHL contract after this season. I would have much rather signer Kuemper in FA than keep Campbell. This signing is basically saying that Petersen and Campbell are our future goaltenders.


LMAO what?

Outside of last season (where he averaged a 0.928 SV% over 31 games) he's only played SEVEN NHL games.

And in those 7 NHL games (prior to last season) ... he averaged a 0.937 SV% ... giving him a 0.930 SV% on his 38 game NHL career.

So would you mind explaining why you think he's been "very inconsistent"?

And if you'd like a frame of reference that explains just how ridiculous you sound:

The Oilers gave Mikko Koskinen a $4,500,000 cap-hit for 3 years ... when he had a 0.906 SV% over a 29 game NHL career.
vmark a aimé ceci.
8 sep 2019 à 18 h 04
#22
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 1,727
Mentions "j'aime": 140
Quoting: moli92
Why can't they trade Quick?


Terrible contract. You’d have to pay a prime asset to move him.
palhal a aimé ceci.
8 sep 2019 à 18 h 50
#23
Rejoint: aoû 2017
Messages: 1,607
Mentions "j'aime": 495
Quoting: drewjenks
LMAO what?

Outside of last season (where he averaged a 0.928 SV% over 31 games) he's only played SEVEN NHL games.

And in those 7 NHL games (prior to last season) ... he averaged a 0.937 SV% ... giving him a 0.930 SV% on his 38 game NHL career.

That's a Vesina level SV% (in a 50-60 game season). So would you mind explaining why you think he's been "very inconsistent"?

And if you'd like a frame of reference that explains just how ridiculous you sound:

The Oilers just gave Mikko Koskinen a $4,500,000 cap-hit for 3 years ... when he had a 0.906 SV% over a 29 game NHL career.
8 sep 2019 à 19 h 58
#24
Rejoint: jun 2018
Messages: 7,798
Mentions "j'aime": 1,568
Quoting: AH96
Doesn’t make sense. Cal Peterson is poised to take the starting role and you can’t waive or trade Quick.


you don't let a quality tender leave. this is a good signing. This kid can play at the NHL level, be it a back up or even a starter.

Quick isn't hard to move, he can still play.
8 sep 2019 à 21 h 18
#25
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 1,727
Mentions "j'aime": 140
Quoting: pharrow
you don't let a quality tender leave. this is a good signing. This kid can play at the NHL level, be it a back up or even a starter.

Quick isn't hard to move, he can still play.


His ability is below league average and his cap and term are just under Lucic numbers. Goalies don’t fetch a lot in general let alone sub-par goaltenders with injury history on the bad side of 30.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Soumettre les modifications du sondage